Hurricane/Earthquake Housing That is Cheap and Safe

I know the Island of Haiti is dealing with a huge demand for new houses that will take the hurricanes and, now, the earthquake tremors, so I began to think about the shape of the egg.

I was at a seminar on sustainable housing that uses clay, gravel and cement, all easy to get and most areas of the world do have them all. This was the beginning of an idea that would possibly work in Haiti, because it is intensive in manual labour, does not require machinery or rebar, and would be much stronger than the brick and mortar they now depend on.

The shape of the egg is remarkably stable. The question then became more of the techniques and means to build houses that were using this shape, and, at the same time, not require a huge amount of engineering expertise or imported materials. So I connected the two ideas, but how to make this structure without using wood or steel, both prohibitively expensive for anyone other than the rich in Haiti.

Churches gave me the answer. Ribs! I have seen domes in churches hit with bombs, and yet the only damage was to the area where the bomb went through, but the structure stayed strong.

So, I thought on how to design this with a good sustainability and keep the water from causing more mud slides and ruining the hills. Cup and Saucer!

Put the house on three points of support that are dug deeper into the earth, then build the walls, 2 feet straight up, then curving up to the dome. Add some perimeter walls or surface that is slightly dished in the middle, and the rain should run into this. Now, what to do with the rain?

Drip system that would water trees, gardens and provide a means to control the runoff, without creating a huge mud slide.

Now to the needs of the inhabitants, which would present a challenge. Light…. where would that come from without causing a fault in the dome or provide a weakening of the walls? Several options came to mind here. Fibre optics transmit light, but that would be expensive in Haiti. What would be a feasible substitute? Glass rods….. possible. Tubes set into the wall with glass shards, but that would require a means to seal up either end of the tube. Hmmm well, I know that old car windows are made of tempered glass, as are the covers for signal lights, etc. These would require setting into the walls as the walls rise, but a possibility.

The walls themselves are labour intensive, can use the rubble and debris, and would become something far better for the people. How are the walls made?

Two ways to mix the material. One is simple cement, combined with clay and small gravel or debris, to a consistency of dry cookie dough. It will clump slightly, but is not a fluid or the standard concrete slurry that most people know. The second way is to use steel fiber reinforced concrete, which would be good for things like orphanages and larger structures, but expensive for the average house.

How do the walls go up? Forms, basic forms made of scrap wood, metal, that are bent to the curve in the wall. These are set at the base, and the “feet” of the house are dug below the ground to use as anchors, which may not really be necessary, but still would stabilize the structure, especially on a hillside location.

The material is mixed to a crumbly consistency, then put into the forms. After that, either a person using a pole with a flat piece on the bottom (a tamper)  or a similar mechanical means are used to pack the material. I have seen these walls used to build houses in an earthquake zone, and, while done vertically, they have passed the codes for housing. The curves are the stronger shape.

Walls can be built with this method, and they have been used as small versions of retaining walls.

Now, to get fancy here. Windows…… how to put windows into the structure without defeating the whole purpose? Triangles! Placement of triangular windows that are next to the interior ribs would be structurally strong enough to withstand hurricanes and earthquakes, as long as the glass was put into either a frame that had some “give” or were from such things as old car windows (tempered glass) and aligned with the outer surface. This would avoid the vortices or any other possibility of wind damage.

Sewer or waste water would have to be removed, so this would require either an interior means of disposal or the use of some kind of disposal that could be connected using either earth (think outhouse) or a cistern that would work something like a septic tank but with an outlet to a place where plants that absorb toxic and fecal material are planted. There are several examples of this worldwide, so the plants would need to be indigenous to Haiti or tropical plants.

The sustainability of these houses would require trees and bushes to be planted around them, to both stabilize the earth and to absorb rain. Gardens could be either container gardens, which would be far more efficient use of the land and much easier to provide for each house, or small areas that are walled in, to prevent damage from the severe weather.

The design would make for 270 degrees of solid walls, with the remaining 90 degrees open for doors and other exterior use. Ideally these houses would be set so that the prevailing winds come from the “back” or the side of the house, so that the hurricane strength winds would be dealt with by the house itself.

Curves are far more stable than almost anything else, and using the material at hand is far better than importing it. These houses can be built using very basic knowledge and training, which means that the Haitians themselves could do this. I do NOT want, in any way, to encourage some multi-national company to exploit the people more, when these houses are available!

I did NOT put the recipe or mix specifications in this article. But, the debris, the rubble, the clay, the gravel and cement are all available.

Haiti Just Cannot Seem to Get a Break, Hire Them to Work!

I was thinking the same thing as the United Nations people apparently. Hire the people in Haiti to work, clearing the rubble, making things, doing what they can to restore some semblance of flow to get the supplies and other necessities moving.

The U.N. has an idea to hire those in Haiti at a very low wage, not to pick on them, not to make them suffer more, but to keep things in balance with money and supplies.

While I think this plan has some very good merits, I wonder how well those of us who are not there could take up this plan, pay for some of those who are homeless and desperate to work.

The idea behind this is relatively simple; give the people who want to DO something a place to do it. So, why not involve those of us who are not on the scene to do the same? Give us something to do as well.

No, I don’t have all the answers as to how this could work, and I damn well will NOT advocate abuse of people who have suffered so much, as some fools would do, may well be doing. I remember all too bloody well how many scam artists and jackasses robbed those people in New Orleans of hope, funds and left them to suffer. May those who did this rot!

But, if this is done with ethics, compassion, and as a way to give the Haitians a way to get back up on their feet while doing something positive, something that will, in the long run, rebuild their country and homes, it is an idea well worth following through.

So, for those who want something to do, on both sides of this equation, this may be one small step on the road. It means that groups would have to get together money, find a way to contact someone who is HONEST, willing to avoid corruption, and willing to take this on and get people the work and dignity they so rightly deserve.

Perhaps it may be someone who works in administration with an NGO, perhaps it may be someone who is a business student who has the strength of character and enthusiasm to take this on, maybe it would be someone who is retired, who wants to give something back. But whoever this person or group is, this may just be the fulfillment of both sides of the desire to make a difference in real terms.

I may well put this forward to some of the people I know here, those who have the integrity and drive to go to Haiti and get this moving.

Now, what are the wages the U.N. are willing to pay? By our standards it is a very poor wage, but given the standard wage in Haiti, a huge boost to someone who is trying to feed their kids. The wage I heard is $5.00 per day. So, if people can get together say ……. $100, and find say…..10 people, that would hire 10 people for 20 days to work. Not a huge sum on either side, but definitely better than nothing.

What this would also do is take the load off the international forces, the NGO’s, and allow far more progress for everyone in Haiti.

Logistics and Human Suffering in Haiti

I live where there may well be a Mega Thrust (above 9.0 on the Richter Scale) earthquake. There is ONE airport here that can take large aircraft and it is built on landfill out into the delta waters. This is where the geologists know “liquifaction” will happen to the earth, so that airport may well be inoperable after such a huge earthquake, so I really do understand how badly things can turn very quickly.

The entire area is connected by bridges that have NOT been retrofitted to withstand this magnitude of disaster, so those bridges will collapse.

This will cut off almost all possibility of getting emergency supplies anywhere but the main area.

There is one minor airport outside the area, but it is situated well beyond the limits of the major metropolitan area and bridges MUST be crossed to get from there to the cities along the delta.

Now to Haiti. The airport there IS on land, not built on landfill, so it is operable. Yes, there is but one runway, and the aid is forced to get through a bottleneck, but at least they can get it to the island!

Decisions are tough at any time, but when competing demands are ALL urgent, some decisions become life or death, and the price is high no matter which way the decision is made.

Imagine trying to decide whether to cut a limb off and know the chance of living is better if you do, but also try to imagine that cutting off that limb would require surgery, which may not come! Nasty choices but those choices are done minute by minute in Haiti. Most people would freeze, not sure which way to turn, wanting to have some kind of guarantee of the outcome, but in this type of situation, there are NO GUARANTEES!

I understand the need that people have to survive, and yes, if it came down to it, I would be looting too. Food or items CAN be replaced, lives cannot.

When it comes to getting people out, it becomes a reverse flow to the airport, unless there are sea craft that can get to those same people and load them onto ships, boats, or any carriers. So what choices do people make? Do I move those orphans out before I move injured? Who gets priority? If I choose to move the injured out, they may live, but the orphans may die, and if I move the orphans, then those who are injured may die; either way someone will lose.

If it comes to my own life and decisions like this, I know I would grieve for every decision that cost someone pain or death. But, brutal as it is, those decisions must be made, inaction is NOT the answer.

The lessons I have learned from this are going to be applied to my own preparations here. I KNOW there will be no possibility of help, probably for at least 10 days. I am far more fortunate than those in Haiti because I do have the forewarning, the knowledge, the lessons, and I can prepare as best as possible for disaster here.

All I can do is to give what support I can, understand the suffering and do as much as possible to help, even from a very long distance.

Age Of Communication? Not When Catastrophe Strikes

I was just doing some daily silliness when I was drawn to a site, then got a message from Haiti regarding several people still alive, still trapped, with locations, phone numbers and even a small written map.

Today will be one of the last days that any of the search and rescue teams there will find people surviving, so I immediately tried to find any place that could get this vital information to Haiti.

I called the CBC locally and all they had were the phone numbers for the federal government SOS line, which I had already called, waited on, waited some more, then finally got a signal to either leave a message or hang up. DAMN!

I called again, managed to get someone to answer the phone, they gave me a number, which I immediately called. That one gave me another number to call, so I called it too. Then I got a call back to phone the Canadian Red Cross, so I did, and they gave me a number at the Winnepeg office, which, being Saturday, is closed. I tried again, and the only number anyone in the government had was one of the numbers I had already wasted time on.

I screamed in frustration, anger, and disbelief that there was no effective means of getting these vital messages through to the search and rescue teams in Haiti. I personally do not care who gets to these people, what team or person finds them, just that someone does.

I was so frustrated, so damn angry, so determined, and feeling so helpless, but I refused to give up. I went to the Armed Forces site here, read over different links, clicked and changed pages frantically. I finally got one number and called long distance to the disaster office there, and they immediately gave me a number that, finally, would connect me to someone who could use the satellite phones and call Haiti.

By this time, over 2 hours was gone, 2 precious hours for those people trapped in buildings. But, I also knew that there were teams and people looking, searching, and, like me, wanting to find someone to live, to have a longer life.

So much for the Age of Communication when it comes to governments, news media, and others who do try to get information out to people.

There MUST be a better way, given all the technology, the access, the people who are vastly interconnected, but today proved to me that unless you are composed enough, calm enough, to think straight, that getting vital information will not happen quickly enough to save lives.

I know the world is trying every single thing to relieve the pain, alleviate the suffering, and that there are people out there that never even get the opportunity I had to even try to save a life. But when time is ticking madly and lives depend on me, I do get very upset when dealing with inefficient and uninformed phone lines.

What would it have taken for ONE person in all those places I did call to take the initiative and put that information ahead, find the number that I finally did? Yeah, those places are manned by people who are just hired to “answer phones”, but dammit all, lives matter.

Well……………maybe not.

If anyone in my family were stuck, trapped and did manage to get a message out to a stranger, asking for immediate help, I would, perhaps foolishly, expect someone to be as persistent, as determined, to help.

Maybe my expectations are too high.